Hundreds of Tibetans have flocked to social media to urge the Chinese government to reinstate Tibetan language education in schools, following Beijing’s release of a white paper asserting that Tibetan language rights are guaranteed in the region
In the report from March 28 discussing human rights in Tibet, China declared that Tibetan is frequently used in government documents, public announcements, media, and educational institutions, claiming that both Mandarin and Tibetan are taught in primary and secondary schools
However, Tibetans argue that this statement is inaccurate and that China has deliberately sought to diminish the usage of their language, which they view as part of a broader effort to erase Tibetan cultural identity
In 2020, Mandarin became the main language of instruction in all primary and secondary schools in Tibet, labeled as “bilingual” education; however, in practice, Mandarin was predominantly used
In 2023, China introduced a Mandarin-only policy for students taking the annual college entrance examination, placing many ethnic minorities, including Tibetan children who had previously been able to take the test in their native language, at a disadvantage
Moreover, the title of the white paper, “Human Rights in Xizang in the New Era,” utilized the Beijing-endorsed term “Xizang” to refer to Tibet, further indicating efforts to assimilate Tibetans into Han Chinese culture. Tibet for outsiders has been severely limited by China, making it extremely challenging to accurately depict the conditions on the ground.
China’s assertions regarding human rights in Tibet do not align with the actual situation, and Maya Wang, associate China director at Human Rights Watch, urged Beijing to allow unrestricted access for external observers and independent researchers
“Over the last twenty years, the Chinese government has imposed increasingly tighter controls on Tibetans as part of its larger strategy to enforce the assimilation of minority groups,” she stated. “This heightened level of oppression, long documented by human rights organizations and exile media, starkly contrasts with the Chinese government’s claims about safeguarding human rights in Tibet.
